top of page
Search

MCA Adjudication Trends: Why procedural non-compliance in CSR and statutory registers is drawing mandatory penalties

Sep 25
1 min read

A review of recent ROC Adjudication Orders under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 reveals an uncompromising trend: Registrar offices are imposing statutory penalties on companies and officers in default without exception for "inadvertent clerical error."


Two recurring flashpoints in recent adjudication orders:


🔹CSR Unspent Balances (Section 135(5) & 135(6)): Transferring unspent CSR amounts to specified Schedule VII funds or the 'Unspent CSR Account' beyond statutory timelines (30 days / 6 months) invites mandatory penalties. The ROC has consistently rejected requests for compounding when statutory transfer windows lapse without board-approved ongoing project designations.


🔹Significant Beneficial Ownership (SBO) Tracking (Section 90): Failure to issue notices in Form BEN-4 to entities holding more than 10% voting rights or exercise of significant influence has led to substantial penalties on promoters, directors, and the reporting company.


In corporate law, compliance is measured not by intention, but by strict calendar adherence and documentation trails.


An independent Secretarial Health-check uncovers and remediates these issues before the ROC issues an inquiry or adjudication notice.


How confident is your leadership team that your CSR committee documentation and SBO declarations are fully compliant with latest MCA notifications?


Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2026 Sandeep Lakhotia & Associates.

bottom of page